Hensel’s proof of the transcendence of e
The original reference is here
In 1905, Hensel provided the following proof about the transcendence of \(e\).
By the Taylor expansion of \(e\) at \(0\) we get:
From this expansion, we see that \(e\) satisfies an equation of the form \(y^p = 1 + pu\), where \(u\) is a \(p\)-adic unit (Exercise).
But the polynomial \(y^p - (1 + pu)\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}_p\), the fraction field of \(\mathbb{Z}_p\):
writing \(y = 1 + z\) and expanding, we get
which is irreducible by the Eisenstein criterion.
Therefore \(e\) must have degree at least \(p\) over \(\mathbb{Q}_p\). Hence:
but this is true for any prime \(p\), so \(e\) must be transcendental.
Now, can you spot the flaw in this argument?