Around Fontaine’s Period Rings

Published:

‘I live my life in widening rings…’


Ich lebe mein Leben in wachsenden Ringen,
die sich über die Dinge ziehn.
Ich werde den letzten vielleicht nicht vollbringen,
aber versuchen will ich ihn.

Ich kreise um Gott, um den uralten Turm,
und ich kreise jahrtausendelang;
und ich weiß noch nicht: bin ich ein Falke, ein Sturm
oder ein großer Gesang.

Rainer Maria Rilke, 1899

Rilke’s ever‑widening rings set the mood for these informal notes on p‑adic period rings: each new “ring” in Fontaine’s theory encircles the previous one, revealing deep arithmetic phenomena. (I know this poem only thanks to Ignazio Longhi). Below is a short summary of a seminar I gave on this topic (PDF).


A (really sketchy) timeline

YearMilestone
1967Tate defines p‑divisible groups  •  Serre asks for their periods
1979 – 1982Fontaine introduces Barsotti–Tate rings and constructs \(B_{\mathrm{dR}}\), \(B_{\mathrm{crys}}\), \(B_{\mathrm{st}}\)
2011Beilinson re-proves the de Rham comparison in generality; Scholze coins the term perfectoid and open new ways
since 2012Period rings (an their generalizations) drive modern p‑adic Hodge theory, Euler systems and beyond

Three important features 🍴

  1. The first ring already contains the period of the punctured disk.
    In the Fontaine construction one can consider

    \[``2\pi i ''=t := \log\!\bigl([1^{\flat}]\bigr) = \sum_{n>0}\frac{(-1)^{n-1}\bigl([1^{\flat}]-1\bigr)^{n}}{n}\]

    and this mysterious element generates the filtration on \(B_{\mathrm{dR}}^{+}\).

  2. Crystalline → semi‑stable → de Rham

    \[B_{\mathrm{crys}} \subset B_{\mathrm{st}} \subset B_{\mathrm{dR}}\]

    Every inclusion adds exactly the structure needed (Frobenius, then monodromy, then filtration) so that a Galois representation is admissible precisely when it comes from good, semi‑stable or general geometry.

  3. A single short exact sequence ties everything together.
    Fontaine’s fundamental sequence

    \[\displaystyle 0\to Q_{p}(r)\to\mathrm{Fil}^{r}B_{crys}\xrightarrow{\varphi/p^{r-1}}B_{crys}\to 0\]

    giving the first link between étale and de Rham cohomology, the same way the integration of differential forms over cycles realizes the connection between singular cohomology and and de Rham cohomology in the classical setting.


  • more details in the PDF (comments are wellcome)

  • An alternative to the poem is, as suggested by Colmez, the beggining of the lord of the rings. What is your choice?